Chapter 223 Three distribution gears
After identifying the unemployed group, the country did not engage in egalitarianism.
But among the unemployed, they are further divided into three groups and implemented differentiated distribution.
That is: single group, married group without children, and married group with children.
·Those who receive the most money are those who are married with children, followed by those who are married without children, and finally the single group.
The purpose of adopting such a differentiated distribution mechanism is very obvious, which is to encourage people to get married, and after getting married, it is best to have children.
At the current stage, the progress of productivity has promoted the birth of a new distribution mechanism. What really causes the country a headache is that after distributing money to single groups, it will bring about a series of potential social instability factors.
A person who has money, nothing to do, and is single is commonly known as an invincible person.
If we can gather together and automatically refresh an idea king, this will be the most prosperous place in the country.
In short, if there are too many idle singles, the potential number and probability of committing suicide and seeking excitement will also increase significantly, which can easily become a destabilizing factor in society.
So we have to give them a constraint, that is, family and children.
This is to kill two birds with one stone. It not only gives them a constraint and reduces potential unsettled elements, it can also generate a large number of new people in the future, releasing consumption power and reducing the risk of overcapacity.
With a wife and children at home, there are responsibilities, fetters, concerns, and even weaknesses.
When you go to do something, you have to first think about whether your wife and children will be implicated.
In other words, the probability of becoming a potentially unstable element in society will be greatly reduced. If you have a wife and children, you don’t need a bicycle.
· Among these three groups, the pressure on the single group is inherently the least.
After all, if one person has enough food and the whole family is not hungry, it can easily become a factor of instability, so the money received is the least among the three groups.
If you want to receive more money and receive more benefits, get married. If you want to receive the highest-end money, then have children.
If you get divorced, whether you are a married family with no children or a family with children, you will automatically be downgraded to a single person. After the divorce, you can only receive money according to the standards of a single person.
Seeing this, Lu An couldn't help but nodded and said: "This regulation is very subtle. Now the divorce rate is getting worse and worse. This regulation can effectively curb the rise in the divorce rate. There will be fewer single people, and potential unstable factors will also be reduced."
After the new distribution mechanism was implemented, the polarity reversed.
Only by getting married, the quality of life will increase. On the contrary, divorce will cause the quality of life to decrease.
And it is not a unilateral decline, it will decline for both men and women, because after divorce, the money received by the single group will be sharply reduced.
The country will not specifically care about whether you are happy or unhappy after marriage, because this is a very subjective concept and cannot be objectively quantified.
This is not an obligation of the state, but you should make a careful decision before getting married.
I feel unhappy after marriage, but I don’t want to get divorced, which will lead to a decline in material conditions. My choice is to endure it with tears. If I can’t bear it, get divorced, and if I want to get more money, then get married again.
It's just that after a divorce, especially if you have a divorced mother with children Debuff, whether you can successfully remarry is up to the individual.
This is also the potential cost and risk of divorce, so marriage should be treated with caution.
If you treat your marriage as a child's play, you can't blame others.
However, what is certain is that this regulation will definitely increase the marriage rate and reduce the divorce rate.
Single people who are not married will find ways to get married, and married people will be extremely cautious about divorce and will not talk about divorce easily, because once they get married, they will most likely have children in order to get the highest level of money.
Having children and then getting divorced, the quality of life will drop off a cliff overnight.
The most important thing is that if you are divorced and want to remarry with children, the difficulty will increase exponentially. In turn, you will not treat divorce as a child's play.
Lu An flipped through the materials and came to the specific allocation quota preliminary plan, and couldn't help but nodded to himself: "I personally think there is no problem with the idea of this plan, but there is a lot of resistance. Most single groups are not happy, and they will find it unfair, and even scold them."
The specific distribution initially determined is:
· Single people can receive 1,300 yuan per month.
·Married families can receive 2,000 yuan per person per month, for a total of 4,000 yuan for two people.
·Married families with children can receive RMB 4,000 per person per month, for a total of RMB 8,000 for two people. In addition, there are additional subsidies for children, with a monthly subsidy of RMB 600 per child until the child reaches the age of 12.
When discussing additional subsidies for children, some people proposed that the subsidy be until the age of 6, while others proposed that the subsidy be until the age of 18.
In the end, I decided to settle on 12 years old.
It can be seen that this distribution mechanism suitable for the transition period is an institutional drive to increase people's willingness to get married and have children.
Marriage and having children are personal freedoms, and the state will certainly not impose them.
But the benefits you can get if you get married and have children have indeed doubled and increased significantly, which is visible to the naked eye. On the contrary, the benefits you get are much less.
How to choose depends on your own wishes.
A single person can get 1,300 yuan, while a married person with children can get 4,000 yuan. The difference between the two is 2,700 yuan.
In fact, the difference is at least 3,300 yuan, because if you have at least one child at the same time, you can get an additional 600 yuan subsidy, the second child is 1,200 yuan, and the third child is 1,800 yuan.
From the perspective of contribution to society, among the general public groups that make up the absolute majority of the population, the largest contribution of these three groups is definitely the married families with children, followed by the married, and finally the single group.
In terms of consumption power alone, the contribution of married families with children must be much greater than that of the latter two, while single people can only feed one person and the whole family is not hungry.
One more married family with children reduces one potential social instability factor, which is another major contribution.
Single people with nothing to do are actually potentially unstable factors, and even deduct points in terms of their contribution to society.
As for the few singles who are talented or have outstanding personal abilities, their contribution to society may be greater or even much greater than that of ordinary married families with children.
But they are all talented people, and their annual income must be tens of millions or even tens of millions of social elites. They are not short of these three melons and two dates, and there is a high probability that they will not be unemployed.
Taking a step back, even if he is unemployed, he will not take the initiative to register, because once he is registered as unemployed, his worth will depreciate and his bargaining power will be reduced. When he is re-employed in the future, the company will lower his price, so this group of people, regardless of gender, can be simply ignored.
It can be seen that the state’s purpose in formulating this distribution mechanism is to allow those who contribute more to society to receive more welfare distribution.
In the past, including now, the simplest way for a person to contribute to society is to labor, work, and engage in productive activities.
But in the new era of robots, the simplest ways to contribute to society will be to get married, have children, and consume.
Even now, as long as you get married, have children, and consume, you are still making a contribution to society.
But the problem is that it is not the simplest way at the moment.
It is difficult to get married now, and it is even more difficult to raise and raise children after giving birth. With such a dilemma, how can one dare to spend so much.
Marriage and having children are already the biggest consumption.
This differentiated distribution mechanism applicable to the "transition period" actually implies another disguised single tax.
Because the benefits allocated to single people are actually much smaller than those of married people, the money collected from robot taxes and fees has not been reduced. At the same time, married people can get more money than single people.
This is equivalent to single people using their own money to make transfer payments to subsidize other married families.
It is 100% certain that once this distribution mechanism is announced, single people will definitely curse, shout about injustice, and the rhythm will definitely skyrocket.
A single person is not a human being? Are married people superior to others?
This kind of remarks will definitely fly everywhere, because interests determine the position, and it is inevitable that single people will be dissatisfied.
It’s okay to be dissatisfied.
If they are satisfied, there will be fewer people willing to get married.
Being single has less responsibilities and less pressure, which is the most comfortable state.
If we are no longer willing to get married and have children, how can we maintain population growth and normal generational replacement?
If the population growth cannot keep up and the overall consumption power cannot keep up with the growth, how can the oversupply crisis be suppressed if the production capacity is still increasing significantly?
…
(End of this chapter)